In a recent episode of ESPN’s “First Take,” former NFL quarterback Cam Newton sparked debate by criticizing Notre Dame’s inclusion in the College Football Playoff (CFP).
Newton labeled the Fighting Irish as “college football’s Dallas Cowboys,” suggesting that, despite their storied legacy, they no longer merit a spot among the nation’s elite teams.
Newton’s critique centered on Notre Dame’s perceived underperformance in high-stakes games. He argued that the team often falls short when facing top-tier competition, leading to lopsided defeats that undermine their CFP credentials. “Every time you try to root for the underdog, they get smashed,” Newton remarked, expressing skepticism about the team’s ability to compete at the highest level.
Ryan Clark, a fellow analyst on “First Take” and father of Notre Dame safety Jordan Clark, countered Newton’s assertions. Clark highlighted Notre Dame’s recent successes, including a notable victory over Texas A&M at Kyle Field—a venue where several Southeastern Conference (SEC) teams, including Clark’s alma mater LSU, suffered defeats. Clark emphasized that Notre Dame’s performance against such opponents demonstrates their capability to compete with top programs.
The debate touches on a broader discussion about Notre Dame’s independent status in college football. Newton suggested that the Fighting Irish’s lack of conference affiliation affords them a less rigorous schedule, potentially easing their path to the CFP. He contended that teams within conferences face consistently tougher competition, which should be a consideration in playoff selections.
Despite Newton’s criticisms, Notre Dame’s recent performances have bolstered their case for inclusion in the CFP. The team secured a 27-17 victory over Indiana in the opening round, advancing to a Sugar Bowl matchup against Georgia. Their success in these games challenges the narrative that they are unfit for high-level competition.
Clark’s defense of Notre Dame also touched on the program’s historical significance and widespread fan base. He acknowledged that, much like the Dallas Cowboys, Notre Dame holds a unique place in American sports culture, attracting national attention regardless of their recent performances. This enduring popularity contributes to their frequent consideration for prominent bowl games and playoff spots.
The exchange between Newton and Clark underscores the ongoing debate about the criteria for CFP selection, particularly concerning teams with storied histories but recent inconsistencies. It raises questions about the weight of legacy versus current performance and the impact of conference affiliation on a team’s perceived strength.
As the CFP continues to evolve, discussions like these highlight the complexities involved in selecting the nation’s top college football teams. Notre Dame’s upcoming games will provide further evidence for both supporters and critics regarding their place among the elite, potentially influencing future considerations for independent programs seeking playoff berths.
